A compilation of tips and resources.
Jump to:
Constructive Feedback
A large role of a mentor is to provide mentees with positive and constructive feedback to guide their growth as researchers, teammates, and leaders. Sometimes giving or receiving feedback can feel awkward, or even uncomfortable. Drawing from Radical Candor, the following information can help reduce the barrier and make sure your feedback lands well.
Formula for Constructive Feedback
CONTEXT + OBSERVATION + RESULT + INVITATION
- Context = cite a specific situation
- Observation = describe a behavior
- Result = what happens for your mentee or for others
- Invitation = ask your mentee to participate in finding solutions
Examples
“When you come to our one-on-one meetings, I noticed that you tend to ask me to take the lead. As students progress in their projects, it can be beneficial for them to take the lead in meetings instead. That way we use our time as it is most helpful to you, and you get to manage your project more yourself. What do you think about trying that the next time we meet?”
“During your practice presentation, you seemed to get more nervous when the group asked questions, and your responses became more blunt. Sometimes that can tell an audience that you don’t want to engage in a scientific discussion. What were you feeling in the moment, or what thoughts were going through your head?”
Mentoring Compacts & Agreements
Purpose & Goals Potential Pitfalls
|
Potential Pitfalls
|
Creating Your First Compact
- PI can create first draft, then invite comments
- Alternatively, co-draft with mentees
- Dedicate a lab meeting (or more) to work on it together
- More buy-in with team approach
- Start with values, then add on expectations for mentor and mentees
- Flexibility – what is a consistent expectation for everyone? What should be flexible to meet the mentee where they’re at?
Potential Sections and Approaches
- Separate policies into a different document
- Time off
- Onboarding/offboarding steps
- Facilities
- Key contacts
- Important resources
- Key protocols
- Conflict resolution
- “Nuts and bolts”
- Adapt for particular trainees?
- High school students –
- Undergrads – expectations for grading if enrolled in research-for-credit courses
- Postbacs –
- Grad students –
- Postdocs –
- Techs/lab managers –
- Trainees can see different expectations
- Tone
- Formal tone can feel like a legal document
- Informal tone can feel more supportive and conversational (I will do… vs. the PI will do…)
- Bullet points
- Lots of text may not be read and can feel overwhelming
- Be specific
- Consistency vs. flexibility
- Some trainees (PhD students) have particular milestones in place, so you may not have to replicate those expectations
- Individuals for trainees – professional development, career goals, meeting schedule
- Invitation to ask for the support you need to be successful
- Table of responsibilities for mentor and mentees to show how they complement each other
Revisit
- Once per year or when many new people start – dedicate a lab meeting to update together
- Each new trainee – revisit compact along with their IDP once/twice per year
- Can combine with long-term project planning
- If someone isn’t meeting the agreed expectations
- Face to face conversation
- What’s the observed behavior?
- What’s going on? (invite disclosures)
Resources
- Example compacts from the OGE mentor training
- Library of sample compacts from CIMER
- Pre-print on lab manuals/compacts: https://osf.io/preprints/metaarxiv/bzcxg/
- A PLoS Comp Bio article about tips for compacts: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005709